United States of America, and v. Daniel Soranno
This text of 442 F.2d 1350 (United States of America, and v. Daniel Soranno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
442 F.2d 1350
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Daniel SORANNO, Appellant.
No. 71-1120.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 3, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Thomas J. MacBride, Judge.
J. B. Tietz (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Brewster Q. Morgan, Asst. U. S. Atty., (argued), Dwayne Keyes, U. S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is reversed under the authority of United States v. Mount, 9 Cir., 438 F.2d 1072.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 F.2d 1350, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-daniel-soranno-ca9-1971.