United States of America, and v. Dalton Carl Smith
This text of 445 F.2d 861 (United States of America, and v. Dalton Carl Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conviction in this case involving stolen and forged securities is affirmed.
It is said there should have been a severance of the substantive and conspiracy counts. No motion for a severance is in the record.
There is a point about Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476. This is not a Bruton case. United States v. Griffin (9 Cir., 1970), 434 F.2d 978, is applicable.
Objection is made that when certain statements of coeonspirators were admitted in evidence the conspiracy hadn’t been proved. In this case we find this to be only a question of order of proof within the trial court’s discretion. See United States v. Knight (9 Cir., 1969), 416 F.2d 1181.
There is no merit to the contention that there was insufficient evidence. The evidence was abundant and the jury made no mistake.
Other points raised we find insubstantial.
The mandate will issue now.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
445 F.2d 861, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-dalton-carl-smith-ca9-1971.