United States of America, and v. Charles Russell, And

453 F.2d 1379
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 1972
Docket71-2494
StatusPublished

This text of 453 F.2d 1379 (United States of America, and v. Charles Russell, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America, and v. Charles Russell, And, 453 F.2d 1379 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed in this judge-tried criminal case.

The defendant committed the act involved in the indictment. The question was on his sanity measured by Wade v. United States, 9th Cir., 426 F.2d 64 (1970).

We conclude the trial court could find Russell sane beyond a reasonable doubt, and we should not disturb its finding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Don Wade v. United States
426 F.2d 64 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 F.2d 1379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-charles-russell-and-ca9-1972.