United States of America, and v. Biagio Campisi
This text of 445 F.2d 317 (United States of America, and v. Biagio Campisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question on appeal is whether the jury was entitled to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was legally responsible for the bank robberies which he committed. Conversely, should a motion for a judgment of acquittal *318 have been granted because of his mental problems, which were certainly serious?
The jury was rightly instructed under Wade v. United States, 426 F.2d 64 (9th Cir. 1970).
We cannot say as a matter of law that the insanity issue should not have gone to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
445 F.2d 317, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-biagio-campisi-ca9-1971.