United States of America, and v. Biagio Campisi

445 F.2d 317, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8540
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 13, 1971
Docket71-1362
StatusPublished

This text of 445 F.2d 317 (United States of America, and v. Biagio Campisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America, and v. Biagio Campisi, 445 F.2d 317, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8540 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The question on appeal is whether the jury was entitled to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was legally responsible for the bank robberies which he committed. Conversely, should a motion for a judgment of acquittal *318 have been granted because of his mental problems, which were certainly serious?

The jury was rightly instructed under Wade v. United States, 426 F.2d 64 (9th Cir. 1970).

We cannot say as a matter of law that the insanity issue should not have gone to the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Don Wade v. United States
426 F.2d 64 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 F.2d 317, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-biagio-campisi-ca9-1971.