United States of America, and v. Alfred W. Blackman

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. Alfred W. Blackman

437 F.2d 456

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 17, 1971·No. 26185_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We find there is adequate evidence to sustain the judgment beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant was restricted somewhat on proof of a bad debt deduction for the year 1963. We might have had a different case if there had been a more specific offer of proof on the deduction and the proof had then been rejected,.

It is ordered that the mandate go down now.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We find there is adequate evidence to sustain the judgment beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant was restricted somewhat on proof of a bad debt deduction for the year 1963. We might have had a different case if there had been a more specific offer of proof on the deduction and the proof had then been rejected,.

It is ordered that the mandate go down now.

United States of America, and v. Alfred W. Blackman, 437 F.2d 456 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

437 F.2d 456 (United States of America, and v. Alfred W. Blackman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.