United States National Bank v. Stuart

Supreme Court of Colorado

United States National Bank v. Stuart

266 P. 1116, 83 Colo. 546, 1928 Colo. LEXIS 274

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedApril 16, 1928

DocketNo. 12,024.

StatusPublished

This text of 266 P. 1116 (United States National Bank v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States National Bank v. Stuart, 266 P. 1116, 83 Colo. 546, 1928 Colo. LEXIS 274 (Colo. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Campbell does not participate in the consideration of this cause. Justices "Whitford, Adams and Walker are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Denison and Justices Burke and Butler are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As it must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose can be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Campbell does not participate in the consideration of this cause. Justices "Whitford, Adams and Walker are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Denison and Justices Burke and Butler are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As it must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose can be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 P. 1116, 83 Colo. 546, 1928 Colo. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-national-bank-v-stuart-colo-1928.