United States Leather Co. v. First National Bank
This text of 33 S.E. 31 (United States Leather Co. v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only matter litigated upon the trial below was whether or not certain mortgages were valid. A verdict sustaining them was returned. The losing party made a motion for a new trial, and excepted to a judgment overruling the same. Mrs, C. E. Finger, as transferee, was part owner and holder of one of these mortgages, and was a party to the case. She is therefore certainly interested in sustaining the judgment under review, but was not made a party to the bill of exceptions or served with a copy of the same. Accordingly, [264]*264the motion made here to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. Civil Code, § 5547; Craig v. Webb, 70 Ga. 188; Knox v. McCalla, Ibid. 725; Crosthwait v. James, 95 Ga. 570; Inman v. Estes, 104 Ga. 645, and eases cited; Augusta Bank v. Merchants Bank, 104 Ga. 857; White v. Bleckley, 105 Ga. 173.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.E. 31, 107 Ga. 263, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-leather-co-v-first-national-bank-ga-1899.