United States Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
142 N.Y.S. 1148, 158 A.D. 875, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249
Opinion
The plaintiff neither alleged nor proved that the railroad was operated negligently or unreasonably. There is no find-lug of negligent or unreasonable use. The ease is almost identical with Friedman v. N. Y. & Harlem R. R. Co., 89 App. Div. 38, 85 N. Y. Supp. 404; affirmed 180 N. Y. 550, 73 N. E. 1123. See, also, McCarthy v. National Carbonic Gas Co., 189 N. Y. 40, 81 N. E. 549, 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 465, 12 Ann. Cas. 840. Judgment reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Cent. & H. R. R., 142 N.Y.S. 1148, 158 A.D. 875, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
142 N.Y.S. 1148 (United States Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCarty v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.
81 N.E. 549 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Friedman v. New York & Harlem Railroad
89 A.D. 38 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)