United States Hoffman Machinery Corp. v. Nicholas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

United States Hoffman Machinery Corp. v. Nicholas

244 A.D. 740, 279 N.Y.S. 994

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order, as resettled, denying the defendant, appellant’s motion to vacate a warrant of seizure, to direct the return of the chattels on the ground that the warrant is a nullity and to dismiss the supplemental summons and complaint affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. The appealing defendant may answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, as resettled, denying the defendant, appellant’s motion to vacate a warrant of seizure, to direct the return of the chattels on the ground that the warrant is a nullity and to dismiss the supplemental summons and complaint affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. The appealing defendant may answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

United States Hoffman Machinery Corp. v. Nicholas, 244 A.D. 740, 279 N.Y.S. 994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

244 A.D. 740 (United States Hoffman Machinery Corp. v. Nicholas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.