United States Fire Insurance Company v. China Union Lines Limited

496 F.2d 1198, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8500
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 1974
Docket927
StatusPublished

This text of 496 F.2d 1198 (United States Fire Insurance Company v. China Union Lines Limited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Fire Insurance Company v. China Union Lines Limited, 496 F.2d 1198, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8500 (2d Cir. 1974).

Opinion

496 F.2d 1198

UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHINA UNION LINES LIMITED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 927, Docket 73-2552.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued May 9, 1974.
Decided May 22, 1974.

James H. Simonson, New York City (Bigham Englar Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Edward H. Duggan, Jr., New York City (Hill, Betts & Nash, Eli Ellis, Allan J. Berdon, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before ANDERSON, FEINBERG and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Motley. 375 F.Supp. 652 (1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Fire Insurance v. China Union Lines Ltd.
375 F. Supp. 652 (S.D. New York, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 F.2d 1198, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fire-insurance-company-v-china-union-lines-limited-ca2-1974.