United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Coggins

195 So. 2d 482, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1444
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 20, 1967
DocketNo. 44249
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 195 So. 2d 482 (United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Coggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Coggins, 195 So. 2d 482, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1444 (Mich. 1967).

Opinion

ROBERTSON, Justice:

The appellee here, Mrs. J. V. Coggins, Administratrix of the estate of her minor daughter, Linda K. Coggins, brought suit in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Mississippi, against James L. Stanford and Gladys F. Stanford for the wrongful death of her daughter arising out of an automobile accident on May 26, 1963. The jury returned a verdict for $30,000 damages. A judgment for that amount in favor of the appellee and against the Stanfords was entered on February 4, 1964.

Appellee filed a Suggestion for Writ of Garnishment against United States Fire Insurance Company of New York claiming that the said insurance company had issued a policy of automobile liability insurance to the said James L. Stanford and that the policy was in full force and effect at the time of the fatal automobile accident.

Appellant, as garnishee-defendant, filed the Answer required by statute denying that it was indebted to the Stanfords. The ap-pellee, Mrs. Coggins, filed a Contest of the Answer to the Writ of Garnishment and set up in her pleading that on August 14, 1962, the United States Fire Insurance Company had issued an automobile liability insurance policy to the Stanfords insuring them against liability for damages sustained by virtue of the operation of their 1957 Buick automobile for the term of one year. The appellee alleged that the policy was in full force and effect on May 26, 1963, the date of the accident, and, that inasmuch as the garnishee had insured the Stanfords against liability for damages, the garnishee thereby became liable for the $30,000 judg[484]*484ment rendered in favor of the appellee, Mrs. Coggins, Administratrix.

The appellant filed an Answer to the Contest of Answer to the Writ of Garnishment and set up by way of an affirmative defense that the insurance policy had been cancelled on September 19, 1962, when James L. Stanford signed and executed a Lost Policy Cancellation Release. Issue was joined on these pleadings and on a trial of the case by the Circuit Judge sitting as judge and jury, the judge rendered judgment against the garnishee-defendant for $30,000, the amount of the judgment against the Stanfords. Thereupon the garnishee-defendant, appellant here, perfected its appeal to this Court.

The Desporte Insurance Agency of Biloxi, Mississippi, had been writing the automobile liability insurance for Stanford for about ten years. When a one-year policy would expire, Mr. Ernest Desporte would mail or personally deliver to the Stan-fords a renewal policy and when Stanford would purchase another automobile, Des-porte would issue a new policy or endorsement to an existing policy covering the newly purchased automobile. Desporte testified that when he delivered the policy to Mrs. Stanford, he would work out an arrangement for collecting the premium.

Mr. Ernest Desporte summarized his insurance dealings with Mr. Stanford for the two years preceding the issuance of the policy in question, as follows:

“The two policies preceding that, the two policies the two years preceding that was with the Voluntary Writing through the Aetna Casualty Surety Company. Due to circumstances the company declined to accept renewal. Then I had to get an application under an assigned risk. Mr. Stanford took it for one year and then at the end of that year, I told him prior to the end of that year I told him what the premium would be for the renewal, which was higher than the previous year. He said he couldn’t handle it that way. I said with a year with the no losses in the last year, I might be able to try one in my direct company. I wrote that policy with the United States Fire Insurance Company. They immediately notified me to release the company, pick up the policy or sign a lost policy release, and at that date I executed the lost policy release as is shown on the exhibit.”

Desporte further testified that he went to the home of the Stanfords on September 19, 1962, about 10:00 A.M., and the following took place:

“At his home on East Howard Avenue. I told him — I said, ‘James, where’s the policy to be released?’ and I said, ‘Oh, you’re sleeping. Wait a minute, I want to talk to you and I want to be sure you’re wide awake before we do anything. And we shoot the bull, you might say for a few minutes, to be sure he was wide awake and I’d say that few minutes run to about fifteen minutes before I actually went into anything of a business transaction with him to make sure he was well awake, and then I saw that he was well aware of what was going on and then I proceeded with getting to ask him to sign the release because the company requested cancellation immediately. I said, ‘Where is the policy?’ He said his wife was in Louisiana with illness in her family. Her family was ill in Louisiana or Texas and he didn’t know where the policy was. I said to just sign this lost policy release — and I called him Jack- — • sign the lost policy release and it will release the company and when you find the policy later on, you can bring it to me and I signed as witness to his signature and got it in the mail that night.
Q. When you found him then, Mr. Stanford had been asleep and you woke him up, did you not ?
A. Yes, sir, he had been on the late hour shift for the Continental Trail-way.
[485]*485Q. And he was in a sleepy, dazed condition while you were sitting there talking with him?
A. I was talking with him to he sure he came out of that sleepy, dazed condition and he was well aware of the business transaction. He was not in a sleepy, dazed condition when I asked him to sign the form.”

The Lost Policy Cancellation Release provided:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coghlan v. Glickman
241 F. Supp. 2d 643 (S.D. Mississippi, 2001)
Etheridge v. Union National Life Insurance Co.
349 So. 2d 945 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 So. 2d 482, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fire-insurance-co-v-coggins-miss-1967.