United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Woodyard
This text of 89 S.E. 492 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Woodyard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
"1. There was no error in the instructions of the presiding judge as to the law of guardian and ward, and the court did not err in charging that a failure to account for money received by him as guardian and placed to his individual credit would be a breach of the guardian’s trust, for which the surety on the guardian’s bond would be liable.
2. Considering the charge of the court under the evidence, no error was committed in the instructions complained of. The requests to charge rejected by the trial judge were not apt and applicable to the case. The verdict finding against the contentions of the plaintiff in error was right and proper. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E. 492, 18 Ga. App. 418, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-v-woodyard-gactapp-1916.