United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. White

63 So. 329, 106 Miss. 28
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 So. 329 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. White, 63 So. 329, 106 Miss. 28 (Mich. 1913).

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

According to the record, appellant, plaintiff below, proved its case in a rather crude manner, but we think enough was proven to escape a peremptory instruction, and the judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.

The record in the case entirely ignores the rules of this court. • Two-thirds of the matter copied into the record is dead wood and imposes upon the losing party a tax [31]*31wholly unwarranted and grossly excessive. This is not the first instance that records coming here from this county have been burdened with redundant matter; and it will be ordered that no costs will be allowed to the clerk of the circuit court for this transcript.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Masonite Corporation v. Guy
77 So. 2d 720 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1955)
American Surety Co. Of New York v. Inmon
187 F.2d 784 (Fifth Circuit, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 So. 329, 106 Miss. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-v-white-miss-1913.