United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Town of West Warwick

379 A.2d 924, 119 R.I. 458, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1951
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedNovember 21, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 379 A.2d 924 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Town of West Warwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Town of West Warwick, 379 A.2d 924, 119 R.I. 458, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1951 (R.I. 1977).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the petitioner from a decree of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission (the commission) dismissing its petition for lack of jurisdiction. The commission held that it is not the proper forum for the resolution of a dispute between the insurer and the insured regarding the reimbursement provisions of a workmen’s compensation insurance contract.

Workmen’s compensation proceedings are entirely statutory. The commission’s jurisdiction and the rights of the parties are governed by the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act G.L. 1956 (1968 Reenactment) §28-31-1 et seq. This court has, heretofore, strictly limited the [459]*459jurisdiction of the commission to disputes between the employer and the employee. See Home Indem. Ins. Co. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 109 R.I. 162, 163, 282 A.2d 594, 595 (1971); Woods v. Safeway Sys., Inc., 102 R.I. 493, 495, 232 A.2d 121, 122 (1967).

Gunning, LaFazia ér Gnys, Inc., Raymond A. LaFazia, for petitioner. John S. Brunero, Town Solicitor, for respondent.

The petitioner here seeks to have the commission interpret the terms of an insurance contract between the insurer and the insured. The determination in no way affects the injured employee. After examining the Act, §§28-35-12 and 28-30-13, in particular, we find that there is no provision therein that expands the jurisdiction of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission to encompass such disputes solely on the basis that the state or any political subdivision thereof may be a party.

The petitioner’s appeal is denied and dismissed, the decree appealed from is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolfe v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of New York
979 S.W.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1998)
Labor Force v. Industrial Commission
911 P.2d 553 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 A.2d 924, 119 R.I. 458, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-v-town-of-west-warwick-ri-1977.