United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State ex rel. Tompkins

204 So. 2d 852, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1217
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1967
DocketNo. 44642
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 204 So. 2d 852 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State ex rel. Tompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State ex rel. Tompkins, 204 So. 2d 852, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1217 (Mich. 1967).

Opinion

PATTERSON, Justice:

This appeal arises from a tort action in the Circuit Court of George County. The defendants below appeal from a jury verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000. No brief or other matter relating to the cause has been filed by the appellee in this case though appellant filed a brief and certified that a true copy of the same was mailed, postage prepaid, United States mail, to the attorneys for the plaintiff on the 7th day of May, 1967.

We have carefully considered the brief of the appellant, as well as the record, and we cannot say that we can with entire confidence affirm the case. In fact, it is our opinion that this case is controlled by Lawler v. Moran, 245 Miss. 301, 302, 148 So.2d 198, 199 (1963), wherein we stated in quoting from Gulf M. & O. RR v. Webster County, 194 Miss. 660, 13 So.2d 644 (1943) :

“The failure to file this brief (by the appellee) is tantamount to a confession of error, and will be accepted as such, and [853]*853the judgment of the court below will be reversed, since an answer to the appellant’s brief cannot be safely made by us, without our doing that which the appellee, by its attorney, should have done, i. e., brief the appellee’s side of the case. This we are not called on to do, therefore the case falls within, and is governed by, W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong, 165 Miss. 380, 140 So. 527.”

For the above reason the judgment of the lower court is reversed without prejudice and the case remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

GILLESPIE, P. J., and RODGERS, BRADY and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. DEPOSIT GUAR. NATL. BANK
304 So. 2d 636 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1974)
First Mobile Home Corporation v. Little
298 So. 2d 676 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1974)
Smith v. Garrett
287 So. 2d 258 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1973)
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Rogers
284 So. 2d 304 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1973)
Ziller v. Atkins Motel Co., Inc.
244 So. 2d 409 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1971)
Jackson v. Walker
240 So. 2d 606 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1970)
Charles F. Hayes & Associates, Inc. v. Blue
233 So. 2d 127 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1970)
Gates v. Green
214 So. 2d 828 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1968)
Griffin v. Breckenridge
204 So. 2d 855 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 So. 2d 852, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-v-state-ex-rel-tompkins-miss-1967.