United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Samuels

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 349
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Samuels. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 Ohio St. 586
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 25, 1927·No. No. 20171·Published

Opinion

MATTHIAS, J.

1. Where in the dishharge of official duty a polce officer fails to take that precaution or exercise that eare which due regard for otheis requires, resulting in injury, his conduct constitutes misfeasance.

2. A surety on the bond of a motor cycle police officer with a condition that he “shall faithfully perform the duties of the office of policeman of said city” is liable for the negligent operation of a motor vehicle by such officer in the performance of his official duties.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, CJ., Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson and Jones, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Samuels, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 349 (Ohio 1927).

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 349 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.