United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rice

152 So. 832, 169 Miss. 75, 1934 Miss. LEXIS 28
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 26, 1934
DocketNo. 31093.
StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 832 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rice, 152 So. 832, 169 Miss. 75, 1934 Miss. LEXIS 28 (Mich. 1934).

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

This suit was filed in the circuit court of Stone county by tbe Attorney-General against tbe Co-operative Home Oil Company, domiciled at McHenry, in Stone county, Miss., and the .United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, surety on its bond filed with tbe state auditor as required by section 4, chapter 21, Laws of 1928., Extraordinary Session, seeking to collect the sum of two' thousand, five hundred eleven dollars and seventy-seven cents, representing tbe two cents per gallon sea-wall tax on gasoline sold in Harrison county, and a penalty of twenty-five per cent, on tbe amount alleged to be due. As exhibits to tbe declaration, there were filed copies of tbe bond executed by tbe appellant and of tbe order of tbe board of supervisors of Harrison county levying a seawall tax. Tbe bond contained tbe following recitations:

“Whereas, tbe said principal has applied to tbe .Auditor of Public Accounts for a permit to engage in tbe business as distributor or wholesaler of gasoline in tbe State of Mississippi, under section 4, chapter 21, Laws of 1928', as passed by tbe 1928. Extraordinary Session of tbe Legislature of tbe State of Mississippi, or any succeeding law that may come into effect;

“Now, therefore, tbe condition of this obligation is such that if tbe said principal, Licensee, shall fully comply with tbe law above referred to. pertaining to distributors or wholesale dealers of gasoline and pay all excise taxes and penalties provided for or required by said Act or Acts, for the period of one year from July 8th, 1930, tbe date of tbe issuance of said permit, this» obligation to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect.”

Tbe order of the board of supervisors of Harrison county, which was adopted on December 12, 1925, re *79 cites in part as follows: “That by virtue of Chapter 319, Laws of 1924, an excise tax of Two Cents per gallon on gasoline hereafter sold in or shipped into Harrison county, Mississippi, for sale in said county, be and the same is hereby levied and shall be collected as provided in said Act and in Chapter 116i of the Laws of 1922 and the amendments thereof.”

To the declaration the defendant Co-operative Home Oil Company entered no appearance, and a judgment by default was entered against it, from which no appeal was prosecuted. The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company filed a demurrer to the declaration, which was overruled. It declined to plead further, and a final judgment was entered against it, from which this appeal was prosecuted.

A tax on gasoline was first imposed in this state by chapter 116, Laws of 1922, which levied a tax of one cent per gallon on gasoline distributed, but did not provide for any bond to guarantee the collection thereof. Chapter 115, Laws of 1924, amended chapter 116, Laws of 1922, by increasing the gasoline tax to three cents per gallon, but required no bond of wholesalers or distributors. In the Laws of 1924 there-also appears the first authorization of a sea-wall tax. This is found in chapter 319, Laws of 1924, section 1 of which provides: “That whenever any public road, street or highway shall extend along' the beach or shore of any body of tidewater, and such road, street or highway, or any part thereof, shall be exposed to, subject to, or in danger of, damage by water driven against the shore by storms, and is not protected in any sea wall ’district, the boards of supervisors shall have the power, and it is hereby made their duty, to erect and maintain all necessary sea walls, break-waters, bulkheads, sloping beach, or other necessary device to' protect and preserve such roads, streets and highways, and for that purpose, and for the purpose of constructing or improving such highway, may issue the bonds of the county therefor.”

*80 Section 91 of this act of 1924 provides, in part, as follows: “In all counties where hoards of supervisors issue bonds of tbe county under tbis chapter an excise tax of not exceeding two cents per gallon, in addition to any such tax levied and collected by tbe state in such counties, for tbe sale of gasoline, naphtha, alcohol, or other fuel or substance ordinarily used for tbe operation of automobiles or other vehicles and machines operated by motor power may be collected by such counties, such collection to be made at tbe time and in tbe manner provided for tbe collection of such like tax levied under chapter 116', Laws, of 1922, or amendments thereto, or other laws providing for tbe collection of such tax.”

Section 9 of said chapter 319, Laws of 1924, was amended in some immaterial respects by chapter 19‘, Laws of 1928, while chapter 198', Laws of 1928, changed tbe existing manner of determining tbe excise tax on tbe sale and use of gasoline, provided for tbe granting of permits to distributors and wholesale dealers, and for tbe first time provided for a bond to be executed by distributors and wholesalers upon tbe granting of such permits.

Chapter 21, Laws of 1928, Extraordinary Session, repealed chapter 198, Laws of 1928, and levied an excise tax of five cents per gallon on all gasoline received in tbe state for sale or use on tbe streets and highways, and provided a complete scheme for tbe determination of tbe amount of tbe tax, and tbe payment and collection thereof. By section 4 of tbis act it was required that a permit to engage in business as a distributor or wholesale dealer of gasoline should only be granted upon tbe applicant executing a surety bond, payable to tbe state of Mississippi, in a sum of not less than three thousand dollars, nor more than twenty-five thousand dollars, tbe amount thereof to be determined in the. manner therein provided, conditioned as follows: “Said bond to be conditioned that tbe licensee will fully comply with all laws pertaining to distributors or wholesale dealers of gaso *81 line and to pay all excise taxes and penalties provided for or required by this act for the year for which a permit has been granted.”

By section 10' of this act it is provided that: “Nothing in this act shall be construed to repeal chapter 3191 of the Laws of 1924, or any amendments thereto, or change the operation thereof.”

There is no provision in chapter 319’, Laws of 1924, or any amendment thereof, requiring the execution of a bond in aid of the collection of the sea-wall taxes thereby authorized. The only existing requirement that distributors of, and wholesale dealers in, gasoline shall execute a bond conditioned to pay an excise tax on gasoline received in this state for sale or use on the streets or highways, is found in chapter 21, Laws of 1928', Extraordinary Session (section 4787, Code of 1930), and this act requires that the licensee shall-execute a bond conditioned that he will fully comply with all laws pertaining to distributors or wholesale dealers of gasoline, and pay all excise taxes and penalties provided for or required by said act for the year for which a permit has been granted. In so far as the payment of excise taxes and penalties is concerned, it will be noted that the requirement is that the bond be conditioned to guarantee the payment of only such taxes and penalties as are provided for or required by said act for the year for which the permit is granted. The bond executed by the appellant was expressly so conditioned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 832, 169 Miss. 75, 1934 Miss. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-v-rice-miss-1934.