United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Park 'N Go of Ga., Inc.

92 F.3d 1561, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22210
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 29, 1996·No. No. 94-8989·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Park ’N Go appealed the grant of summary judgment to United States Fidelity & Guaranty (USF & G), arguing the district court erroneously concluded that USF & G’s liability was limited to $250,000 and therefore erroneously granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee. We — pursuant to Ga. Const, art. VI, § 6 para. 4; O.C.G.A. § 15-2-9; and Rule 37 of the Supreme Court of Georgia — certified to the Supreme Court of Georgia the question of USF & G’s liability. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Park ’N Go of Georgia, Inc., 66 F.3d 273 (11th Cir.1995).

The Supreme Court has answered the certified question in the affirmative. Park ’N Go of Georgia, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 266 Ga. 787, 471 S.E.2d 500 (1996). In the light of the Supreme Court of Georgia’s opinion, we affirm the decision of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Park 'N Go of Ga., Inc., 92 F.3d 1561, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22210 (11th Cir. 1996).

92 F.3d 1561 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Park 'N Go of Ga., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related