United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Johnson

157 N.W. 1069, 133 Minn. 462, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 955
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 2, 1916
DocketNos. 19,702—(108)
StatusPublished

This text of 157 N.W. 1069 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Johnson, 157 N.W. 1069, 133 Minn. 462, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 955 (Mich. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion for leave to interposa an answer and defend in the action. The only question involved is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting the relief. A careful eon[463]*463sideration of the affidavits in support of the application, and those in opposition thereto, leads to an affirmance. The record will not justify the conclusion that there was an abuse of discretion. A discussion of the facts will serve no useful purpose.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 N.W. 1069, 133 Minn. 462, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-v-johnson-minn-1916.