United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hampton
134 F. 734, 67 C.C.A. 638, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 24, 1905·No. No. 1,411·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The findings of fact by the consent referee are not reviewable on this writ further than to ascertain if they are sufficient to warrant the judgment. The waiver of the six months limitation in which to bring suit was sufficiently pleaded, and, we suppose, proved. We find no error in the record.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hampton, 134 F. 734, 67 C.C.A. 638, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271 (5th Cir. 1905).
134 F. 734 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pensacola Shipbuilding Co. v. Southern Wood Preserving Co.
45 F.2d 164 (Fourth Circuit, 1930)
Pensacola Shipbuilding Co. v. Vincennes Bridge Co.
45 F.2d 165 (Fourth Circuit, 1930)