United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hampton
134 F. 734, 67 C.C.A. 638, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1905
DocketNo. 1,411
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 134 F. 734 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hampton, 134 F. 734, 67 C.C.A. 638, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271 (5th Cir. 1905).
Opinion
The findings of fact by the consent referee are not reviewable on this writ further than to ascertain if they are sufficient to warrant the judgment. The waiver of the six months limitation in which to bring suit was sufficiently pleaded, and, we suppose, proved. We find no error in the record.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pensacola Shipbuilding Co. v. Southern Wood Preserving Co.
45 F.2d 164 (Fourth Circuit, 1930)
Pensacola Shipbuilding Co. v. Vincennes Bridge Co.
45 F.2d 165 (Fourth Circuit, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 F. 734, 67 C.C.A. 638, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-v-hampton-ca5-1905.