United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Franklin

43 A.D.2d 844, 352 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5979
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 1974·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for a declaratory judgment, plaintiff appeals from an order-judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 15, 1973, which, on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, rendered a declaration that plaintiff is required to.furnish a defense and insurance coverage to” defendant Jerry A. Franklin for claims of indemnification of the defendants Buckner and Callier for injuries sustained by Franklin’s wife, defendant Carrie Franklin. Order-judgment affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements (see State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Go. v. Westlake, 43 A D 2d 314 [decided herewith]). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Benjamin, J., dissents and votes to [845] reverse and to grant plaintiff’s motion, upon the-grounds stated in Ms dissenting opinion in ■State Farm Mut.. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Westlake (43 A D 2d 314 [decided herewith]). [74 Mise 2d 606.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Franklin, 43 A.D.2d 844, 352 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5979 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

43 A.D.2d 844 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Cassin
601 A.2d 1030 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)