United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Dann

84 So. 176, 79 Fla. 489
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 8, 1920·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the [490]*490respective parties, and tlie record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Browne, C. J., and Whitfield and West, J. J., concur. Taylor and Ellis, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Dann, 84 So. 176, 79 Fla. 489 (Fla. 1920).

84 So. 176 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Dann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.