United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Pensacola

277 F. 429, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1743
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Pensacola. Read the opinion of the Court — 263 F. 344
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 10, 1922·No. No. 3705·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record does not show that any exception was reserved to the court’s charge to the jury, or to its refusal to give requested charges. This being so, the judgment is not subject to be reversed because of any of those rulings. The assignment of errors based upon rulings of the court on objections to evidence does not conform to the requirement of rule 11 of this court (150 Fed. xxvii, 79 C. C. A. xxvii) that such assignment “shall quote the full substance of the evidence admitted or rejected.” However, those rulings have been considered. In our Opinion, none of them involved reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Pensacola, 277 F. 429, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1743 (5th Cir. 1922).

277 F. 429 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Pensacola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.