United States Fid. Guar. v. Linehan, Ins. Comm'r
52 A. 1094, 71 N.H. 622, 1902 N.H. LEXIS 97
Opinion
The facts before the court are conflicting and uncertain, and for that reason do not warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus. Stevens v. Fellows, 70 N. H. 148, 150; Stearns v. Barrett, 1 Mason 153; High Ex. Rem., s. 9; 19 Am. &. Eng. Enc. Law (2d ed.) 726, 727, and numerous authorities there cited.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States Fid. Guar. v. Linehan, Ins. Comm'r, 52 A. 1094, 71 N.H. 622, 1902 N.H. LEXIS 97 (N.H. 1902).
52 A. 1094 (United States Fid. Guar. v. Linehan, Ins. Comm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stearns v. Barrett
22 F. Cas. 1175 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1816)