United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins.

673 N.E.2d 140, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1478
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 1996·No. 96-2516·Published

Opinion

Washington App. Nos. 95CA27 and 95CA29. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue of the exclusion of liability coverage for the operation of a vehicle to deliver pizzas under the facts of this case when the vehicle is “being used to carry persons or property for a fee.” Colonial Ins. Co. of California v. Jermann (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 384, 657 N.E.2d 336, is the conflicting case.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins., 673 N.E.2d 140, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1478 (Ohio 1996).

673 N.E.2d 140 (United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colonial Ins. Co. of California v. Jermann
657 N.E.2d 336 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)