Home/Ohio Supreme Court/United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins.

United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins.

673 N.E.2d 140, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1478
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 18, 1996
Docket96-2516
StatusPublished

This text of 673 N.E.2d 140 (United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins., 673 N.E.2d 140, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1478 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Washington App. Nos. 95CA27 and 95CA29. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue of the exclusion of liability coverage for the operation of a vehicle to deliver pizzas under the facts of this case when the vehicle is “being used to carry persons or property for a fee.” Colonial Ins. Co. of California v. Jermann (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 384, 657 N.E.2d 336, is the conflicting case.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colonial Ins. Co. of California v. Jermann
657 N.E.2d 336 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 N.E.2d 140, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fid-guar-co-v-lightning-rod-mut-ins-ohio-1996.