United States F. G. Co. v. Superior Court

298 P. 63, 113 Cal. App. 436
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 15, 1931
DocketDocket No. 7918.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 298 P. 63 (United States F. G. Co. v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States F. G. Co. v. Superior Court, 298 P. 63, 113 Cal. App. 436 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petition for writ of prohibition.

[1] Petitioner here seeks to restrain the Superior Court from proceeding further with the trial of the action entitled DuttonDredge Company, a Corporation, v. United States Fidelity andGuaranty Company, a corporation, wherein it is sought to recover the sum of $2,812.05 for failure on the part of petitioner to keep the employees of said dredge company insured against liability under the Compensation Act. It is here claimed that the question of the liability of petitioner as an insurance carrier was an issue before the commission and its determination upon the question res judicata. The question whether the decision of the Industrial *Page 437 Accident Commission is res judicata is a matter to be pleaded by petitioner in the trial court and to be there determined.

Petition is denied.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on May 15, 1931.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reidy v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.
29 P.2d 780 (California Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 P. 63, 113 Cal. App. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-f-g-co-v-superior-court-calctapp-1931.