United States ex rel. Zucker v. Osborne

147 F.2d 135
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 2, 1945·No. No. 192·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The writ was issued upon the petition of the relator to test the lawfulness of his restraint as a conscientious objector to military service. He has been duly classified IV-E as a conscientious objector under the provisions of § 5(g) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 305(g), and is an assignee presently restrained as such at Civilian Public Service Camp No. 46 at Big Flats, N. Y., of which the respondent is the director. The writ was dismissed after hearing thereon and the relator has appealed.

The order is affirmed on the authority of Brooks v. United States, 147 F.2d 134 (decided herewith), and of Angelus v. Sullivan, 2 Cir., 246 F. 54; Butler v. Perry, 240 U.S. 328, 36 S.Ct. 258, 60 L.Ed. 672; Selective Draft Cases, 245 U.S. 366, 38 S.Ct. 159, 62 L.Ed. 349, L.R.A.1918C, 361, Ann.Cas.1918B, 856; United States v. Drum, 2 Cir., 107 F.2d 897, 129 A.L.R. 1165; and Seele v. United States, 8 Cir., 133 F.2d 1015. See also, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11, 25 S.Ct. 358, 49 L.Ed. 643, 3 Ann.Cas. 765.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Zucker v. Osborne, 147 F.2d 135 (2d Cir. 1945).

147 F.2d 135 (United States ex rel. Zucker v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bartell
144 F. Supp. 793 (S.D. New York, 1956)
United States v. Smith
124 F. Supp. 406 (E.D. Illinois, 1954)
United States v. Emery
168 F.2d 454 (Second Circuit, 1948)
United States v. Steinel
70 F. Supp. 966 (D. Connecticut, 1946)