United States ex rel. Zabadlija v. Garfinkel

173 F.2d 222
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 27, 1949·No. No. 9730·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania following that Court’s denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Since the opinion of the Court below, 77 F. Supp. 751, there has been decided in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana the case of Kava-dias v. Cross, 1948, 82 F.Supp. 716, in which Judge Swygert wrote an opinion which fully covers the question presented by the immediate appeal. We think Judge Swygert was right and that the District Judge in this case was right.

The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Zabadlija v. Garfinkel, 173 F.2d 222 (3d Cir. 1949).

173 F.2d 222 (United States ex rel. Zabadlija v. Garfinkel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Angelis v. Bouchard
181 F. Supp. 551 (D. New Jersey, 1960)
Vergas v. Shaughnessy
97 F. Supp. 335 (S.D. New York, 1951)