United States ex rel. Woods v. Mayer

4 F. Supp. 653, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1297
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedJuly 12, 1933
DocketNo. 20753
StatusPublished

This text of 4 F. Supp. 653 (United States ex rel. Woods v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Woods v. Mayer, 4 F. Supp. 653, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1297 (W.D. Wash. 1933).

Opinion

NETERER, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The order of the referee upon the report of the trustee to the exceptions thereto is clearly a proceeding within the provisions of the Bankruptcy Law, and, unless reversed by [654]*654the bankruptcy court and modified, as provided by General Order No. 27 (11 USCA § 53), became final and the law of the case. Weidhorn v. Levy, 253 U. S. 268, 40 S. Ct. 534, 64 L. Ed. 898; In re Petersen (D. C.) 252 F. 846. Section 38, Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 66). And such order is res judicata as against collateral attack. An adequate remedy on hearing of report before the referee was available, the parties were advised of the hearing, and were present, and failure to present the same, as now contended for, was concluded. American Surety Co. v. Baldwin, 287 U. S. 156, 53 S. Ct. 98, 77 L. Ed. 231; The Norco (D. C.) 1 F. Supp. 932. See, also, Calaf v. Calaf, 232 U. S. 371, 374, 34 S. Ct. 411, 58 L. Ed. 642; Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co. v. Michigan Railroad Comm., 235 U. S. 402, 406, 35 S. Ct. 126, 59 L. Ed. 288.

Judgment must follow for the plaintiff trustee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Calaf Y Fugurul v. Calaf Y Rivera
232 U.S. 371 (Supreme Court, 1914)
DET. & MACKINAC RY. CO. v. Mich. RR Comm.
235 U.S. 402 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Weidhorn v. Levy
253 U.S. 268 (Supreme Court, 1920)
American Surety Co. v. Baldwin
287 U.S. 156 (Supreme Court, 1932)
In re Petersen
252 F. 846 (D. Nevada, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 F. Supp. 653, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-woods-v-mayer-wawd-1933.