United States ex rel. Woods v. Mayer
This text of 4 F. Supp. 653 (United States ex rel. Woods v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(after stating the facts as above).
The order of the referee upon the report of the trustee to the exceptions thereto is clearly a proceeding within the provisions of the Bankruptcy Law, and, unless reversed by [654]*654the bankruptcy court and modified, as provided by General Order No. 27 (11 USCA § 53), became final and the law of the case. Weidhorn v. Levy, 253 U. S. 268, 40 S. Ct. 534, 64 L. Ed. 898; In re Petersen (D. C.) 252 F. 846. Section 38, Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 66). And such order is res judicata as against collateral attack. An adequate remedy on hearing of report before the referee was available, the parties were advised of the hearing, and were present, and failure to present the same, as now contended for, was concluded. American Surety Co. v. Baldwin, 287 U. S. 156, 53 S. Ct. 98, 77 L. Ed. 231; The Norco (D. C.) 1 F. Supp. 932. See, also, Calaf v. Calaf, 232 U. S. 371, 374, 34 S. Ct. 411, 58 L. Ed. 642; Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co. v. Michigan Railroad Comm., 235 U. S. 402, 406, 35 S. Ct. 126, 59 L. Ed. 288.
Judgment must follow for the plaintiff trustee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 F. Supp. 653, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-woods-v-mayer-wawd-1933.