United States Ex Rel. Watson v. Norton

335 F. Supp. 1324, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11550
CourtDistrict Court, D. Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 22, 1971
DocketCiv. B-368
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 335 F. Supp. 1324 (United States Ex Rel. Watson v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Ex Rel. Watson v. Norton, 335 F. Supp. 1324, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11550 (D. Conn. 1971).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ZAMPANO, District Judge.

The petitioner, presently incarcerated in the Federal Correctional Institution at Danbury, Connecticut, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking to expunge detainers filed against him by the State of Florida. Petitioner, relying on Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374, 89 S.Ct. 575, 21 L.Ed.2d 607 (1969) and Dickey v. Florida, 398 U.S. 30, 90 S.Ct. 1564, 26 L.Ed.2d 26 (1970), repeatedly requested the appropriate prosecutor and court of the State of Florida either to release the detainers or to bring him to trial. To date the Florida authorities have not complied with petitioner’s request.

The government has indicated that it approves of the rulings in Weiss v. Blackwell, 310 F.Supp. 360 (N.D.Ga. 1969) and Lawrence v. Blackwell, 298 F.Supp. 708 (N.D.Ga.1969). This Court adopts the principles established in the Weiss and Lawrence cases and, accordingly, it is

*1325 Ordered, that in the absence of a specific trial date (or term of court) from the State of Florida, by letter to this Court, with a copy to Warden Norton, within 15 days from the date of this order, the Warden shall expunge the detainers complained of from petitioner’s file; and it is further

Ordered, that the petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis be and hereby is granted and that this Order of Court and related documents be filed by the Clerk without payment of the statutory filing fee pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Cummings
528 F. Supp. 1078 (W.D. New York, 1981)
McQueen v. Wyrick
543 S.W.2d 778 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)
Baker v. Schubin
72 Misc. 2d 413 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 F. Supp. 1324, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-watson-v-norton-ctd-1971.