United States Ex Rel. Triple S Alarm Co. v. Westfield Insurance

501 F. App'x 607
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 2013
Docket12-3030
StatusUnpublished

This text of 501 F. App'x 607 (United States Ex Rel. Triple S Alarm Co. v. Westfield Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Ex Rel. Triple S Alarm Co. v. Westfield Insurance, 501 F. App'x 607 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Triple S Alarm Co., Inc., appeals from the judgment of the District Court 1 denying its motion for attorney fees and a penalty under Arkansas law or attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b), in Triple S’s suit under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3131. After careful de novo review of the record, see United States v. Brummels, 15 F.3d 769, 771 (8th Cir.1994), and having considered the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the District Court that Triple S was not entitled to the relief that it sought for the reasons explained in the court’s opinion.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kent J. Brummels
15 F.3d 769 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
501 F. App'x 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-triple-s-alarm-co-v-westfield-insurance-ca8-2013.