United States Ex Rel. Triple S Alarm Co. v. Westfield Insurance
This text of 501 F. App'x 607 (United States Ex Rel. Triple S Alarm Co. v. Westfield Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Triple S Alarm Co., Inc., appeals from the judgment of the District Court 1 denying its motion for attorney fees and a penalty under Arkansas law or attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b), in Triple S’s suit under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3131. After careful de novo review of the record, see United States v. Brummels, 15 F.3d 769, 771 (8th Cir.1994), and having considered the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the District Court that Triple S was not entitled to the relief that it sought for the reasons explained in the court’s opinion.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
501 F. App'x 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-triple-s-alarm-co-v-westfield-insurance-ca8-2013.