United States Ex Rel. Stephen Fink v. Louis Heyd, Criminal Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans

408 F.2d 7, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13348
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 1969
Docket26769
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 408 F.2d 7 (United States Ex Rel. Stephen Fink v. Louis Heyd, Criminal Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Ex Rel. Stephen Fink v. Louis Heyd, Criminal Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans, 408 F.2d 7, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13348 (5th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, who is in the process of appealing his state conviction for a narcotics violation, seeks a declaration from a federal court sitting in habeas corpus that a state statute which operates to deny him bail pending appeal is unconstitutional. He was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment by the state trial court and is therefore ineligible for bail pending appeal by operation of article 314 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure and article I, section 12 of the Louisiana Constitution which prohibit a defendant who is sentenced to a term of five years or more from making an appeal bond.

This Court has held that inasmuch as there is no absolute right to bail pending appeal it will not interfere with a state statute providing for bail under certain circumstances unless the legislation violates fundamental constitutional principles. Sellers v. Georgia, 5th Cir. 1967, 374 F.2d 84. In this case, we agree with the court below, 287 F.Supp. 716 that a determination by the state legislature that any defendant who has been sentenced to five years’ imprisonment or more is such a poor bail risk that he should be prohibited from making an appeal bond is not so arbitrary and unreasonable as to contravene the fourteenth amendment. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dowdye
48 V.I. 45 (Superior Court of The Virgin Islands, 2006)
Pisano v. Shillinger
814 P.2d 274 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1991)
United States v. Hazzard
598 F. Supp. 1442 (N.D. Illinois, 1984)
United States v. Frederick Graewe
689 F.2d 54 (Sixth Circuit, 1982)
Wilcox v. Carter
545 F. Supp. 1043 (M.D. Georgia, 1982)
Huihui v. Shimoda
644 P.2d 968 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1982)
Hart v. State
405 So. 2d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Brown v. Leeke
460 F. Supp. 947 (D. South Carolina, 1978)
Gallie v. Wainwright
362 So. 2d 936 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
King v. East
451 F. Supp. 453 (N.D. Mississippi, 1977)
United States Ex Rel. Vitoratos v. Campbell
410 F. Supp. 1208 (N.D. Ohio, 1976)
Liistro v. Robinson
365 A.2d 109 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1976)
Swain v. State
527 S.W.2d 119 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1975)
Burgess v. Roth
387 F. Supp. 1155 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
Starkey v. Swenson
370 F. Supp. 594 (E.D. Missouri, 1974)
Tunnell v. Wiley
369 F. Supp. 1260 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1974)
Harrington v. Arceneaux
367 F. Supp. 1272 (W.D. Louisiana, 1973)
Bobbie J. Hamilton v. State of New Mexico
479 F.2d 343 (Tenth Circuit, 1973)
Commonwealth v. Fowler
304 A.2d 124 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
408 F.2d 7, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-stephen-fink-v-louis-heyd-criminal-sheriff-of-the-ca5-1969.