United States ex rel. Steinberg v. Cummings

Third Circuit

United States ex rel. Steinberg v. Cummings

85 F.2d 1022, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4363

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedOctober 6, 1936

DocketNo. 6172

StatusPublished

This text of 85 F.2d 1022 (United States ex rel. Steinberg v. Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States ex rel. Steinberg v. Cummings, 85 F.2d 1022, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4363 (3d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the petition of an inmate of the United States Northeastern Penitentiary at Lewisburg, Pa., for ’a writ of habeas corpus.

The judge of the court below in his opinion made full and complete findings of the facts and determined that upon the applicable law the petitioner was not entitled to his discharge.

A study of the record convinces us that the findings of the facts by the judge of the court below are correct. Upon the facts so found, he, in his opinion filed, reached the proper conclusions of law.

The opinion of the learned judge of the court below is accordingly adopted as the opinion of this court, and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the petition of an inmate of the United States Northeastern Penitentiary at Lewisburg, Pa., for ’a writ of habeas corpus.

The judge of the court below in his opinion made full and complete findings of the facts and determined that upon the applicable law the petitioner was not entitled to his discharge.

A study of the record convinces us that the findings of the facts by the judge of the court below are correct. Upon the facts so found, he, in his opinion filed, reached the proper conclusions of law.

The opinion of the learned judge of the court below is accordingly adopted as the opinion of this court, and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 F.2d 1022, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-steinberg-v-cummings-ca3-1936.