United States ex rel. Sammarco v. Morrow

Eighth Circuit

United States ex rel. Sammarco v. Morrow

397 F. App'x 260

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 20, 2010

DocketNo. 10-1631

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 397 F. App'x 260 (United States ex rel. Sammarco v. Morrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States ex rel. Sammarco v. Morrow, 397 F. App'x 260 (8th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darlene C. Sammarco appeals from the order of the District Court¹ dismissing her civil action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the District Court. We also find Sammarco’s allegations of judicial bias to be without merit. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Darlene C. Sammarco appeals from the order of the District Court¹ dismissing her civil action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the District Court. We also find Sammarco’s allegations of judicial bias to be without merit. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

397 F. App'x 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-sammarco-v-morrow-ca8-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack