United States ex rel. Rubin v. Powell

1 F.R.D. 644, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2017
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 21, 1941·Published

Opinion

COXE, District Judge.

It is well settled that writs of habeas corpus issued by the District Court do not run outside of the district. United States ex rel. Belardi v. Day, 3 Cir., 50 F.2d 816; Ex parte Yee Hick Ho, D. C., 33 F.2d 360; New York v. Eno, 155 U.S. 89, 15 S.Ct. 30, 39 L.Ed. 80; Hoeppel v. Street, et al., D. C., 17 F.Supp. 719; In re Boles, 8 Cir., 48 [645]*645F. 75; United States v. Tod, D.C., 291 F. 665.

The writ in this case is, therefore, quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Rubin v. Powell, 1 F.R.D. 644, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2017 (S.D.N.Y. 1941).

1 F.R.D. 644 (United States ex rel. Rubin v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York v. Eno
155 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1894)
United States Ex Rel. Belardi v. Day
50 F.2d 816 (Third Circuit, 1931)
Ex parte Yee Hick Ho
33 F.2d 360 (N.D. California, 1929)
Hoeppel v. Street
17 F. Supp. 719 (District of Columbia, 1937)
United States ex rel. Nazaretian v. Tod
291 F. 665 (S.D. New York, 1923)
In re Boles
48 F. 75 (Eighth Circuit, 1891)