United States ex rel. Rubin v. Powell

1 F.R.D. 644, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2017
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 1 F.R.D. 644 (United States ex rel. Rubin v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Rubin v. Powell, 1 F.R.D. 644, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2017 (S.D.N.Y. 1941).

Opinion

COXE, District Judge.

It is well settled that writs of habeas corpus issued by the District Court do not run outside of the district. United States ex rel. Belardi v. Day, 3 Cir., 50 F.2d 816; Ex parte Yee Hick Ho, D. C., 33 F.2d 360; New York v. Eno, 155 U.S. 89, 15 S.Ct. 30, 39 L.Ed. 80; Hoeppel v. Street, et al., D. C., 17 F.Supp. 719; In re Boles, 8 Cir., 48 [645]*645F. 75; United States v. Tod, D.C., 291 F. 665.

The writ in this case is, therefore, quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York v. Eno
155 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1894)
United States Ex Rel. Belardi v. Day
50 F.2d 816 (Third Circuit, 1931)
Ex parte Yee Hick Ho
33 F.2d 360 (N.D. California, 1929)
Hoeppel v. Street
17 F. Supp. 719 (District of Columbia, 1937)
United States ex rel. Nazaretian v. Tod
291 F. 665 (S.D. New York, 1923)
In re Boles
48 F. 75 (Eighth Circuit, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F.R.D. 644, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-rubin-v-powell-nysd-1941.