United States ex rel. Royster v. McMann
433 F.2d 1013
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 1970
DocketNo. 106, Docket 32919
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 433 F.2d 1013 (United States ex rel. Royster v. McMann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States ex rel. Royster v. McMann, 433 F.2d 1013 (2d Cir. 1970).
Opinion
We affirm in open court the judgment of the district court denying plaintiff’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, on the ground that denial of petitioner’s pro forma request for a suppression hearing did not violate due process, for the reasons given in Judge Weinstein’s opinion, reported at 292 F.Supp. 116.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States of America Ex Rel. James Royster, Relator-Appellant v. Daniel McMann Auburn State Prison, Auburn, New York
433 F.2d 1013 (Second Circuit, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
433 F.2d 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-royster-v-mcmann-ca2-1970.