United States ex rel. Romano v. Fay
344 F.2d 702
Opinion
We affirm the order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, which dismissed the writ for a petition of habeas corpus, for the reasons stated in Judge Tyler’s opinion, reported at 216 F.Supp. 160.
We commend assigned counsel, Robert J. Egan, Esq., for his competent and zealous representation of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States ex rel. Romano v. Fay, 344 F.2d 702 (2d Cir. 1965).
344 F.2d 702 (United States ex rel. Romano v. Fay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Romano v. Fay
216 F. Supp. 160 (S.D. New York, 1963)