United States ex rel. Robinson v. Johnston
This text of 316 U.S. 649 (United States ex rel. Robinson v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The motion for leave to file a second petition for rehearing is granted. The second petition for rehearing is granted. The order denying certiorari, 314 U. S. 675, is vacated, and the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is also granted. In view of the conflict of views which has arisen among the judges of the Ninth Circuit with respect to the decision in this case (see Robinson v. Johnston, 118 F. 2d 998, 1001, and Crockett v. United States, 125 F. 2d 547, 548, 549), and in view of this Court’s decision in Waley v. Johnston, ante, p. 101, re[650]*650versing 124 F. 2d 587, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings, including leave to petitioner to apply for a hearing before the court en banc. See Textile Mills Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U. S. 326.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 U.S. 649, 62 S. Ct. 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-robinson-v-johnston-scotus-1942.