United States ex rel. Phillips v. Ware

189 U.S. 507, 23 S. Ct. 852, 47 L. Ed. 922, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1388
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 20, 1903·No. Nos. 249 and 250; Nos. 251 and 322·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writs of error dis[508] missed for the . want of jurisdiction. Act of March 3, 1901, sec. 233, 31 Stat. 1189, c. 854; act of February 9, 1893, sec. 8, 27 Stat. 434, c. 74; act of March 3, 1885, 23 Stat. 443, c. 355; Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Company v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210; United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280; Cameron v. United States, 146 U. S. 533; South Carolina v. Seymour, 153 U. S. 353.

Mr. Henry D. Phillips and Mr. L. R. Walker for plaintiff in error. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Campbell and Mr. F. L. Campbell for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Phillips v. Ware, 189 U.S. 507, 23 S. Ct. 852, 47 L. Ed. 922, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1388 (1903).

189 U.S. 507 (United States ex rel. Phillips v. Ware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Hopkins
130 U.S. 210 (Supreme Court, 1889)
United States v. Lynch
137 U.S. 280 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Cameron v. United States
146 U.S. 533 (Supreme Court, 1892)
South Carolina v. Seymour
153 U.S. 353 (Supreme Court, 1894)