United States ex rel. Paulding v. Mancusi

Second Circuit

United States ex rel. Paulding v. Mancusi

378 F.2d 368

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 3, 1966·No. No. MR 714·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the motions and dismiss the petition, without prejudice to petitioner’s right to renew his petition in the district court should appropriate proceedings for the relief herein sought be denied in the New York State courts. United States ex rel. Martin v. McMann, 348 F.2d 896 (2 Cir. 1965); United States ex rel. Bagley v. LaVallee, 332 F.2d 890, 892 (2 Cir. 1964). In light of People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257, 273 N.Y.S.2d 897, 220 N.E.2d 653 (1966), the broadened scope of habeas corpus in New York makes it appropriate for the petitioner to seek whatever remedy he may have in such a proceeding in the first instance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We deny the motions and dismiss the petition, without prejudice to petitioner’s right to renew his petition in the district court should appropriate proceedings for the relief herein sought be denied in the New York State courts. United States ex rel. Martin v. McMann, 348 F.2d 896 (2 Cir. 1965); United States ex rel. Bagley v. LaVallee, 332 F.2d 890, 892 (2 Cir. 1964). In light of People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257, 273 N.Y.S.2d 897, 220 N.E.2d 653 (1966), the broadened scope of habeas corpus in New York makes it appropriate for the petitioner to seek whatever remedy he may have in such a proceeding in the first instance.

United States ex rel. Paulding v. Mancusi, 378 F.2d 368 (2d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

378 F.2d 368 (United States ex rel. Paulding v. Mancusi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related