United States ex rel. McGrath v. Mathues
This text of 12 F.2d 1020 (United States ex rel. McGrath v. Mathues) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On due consideration had, this court reached the opinion that the appellants should be remanded to the Northern district of Ohio for trial. In view of the fact that the same question was before the Supreme Court, we deferred filing our opinion. The recent decision of that case, in United States v. Gault, 46 S. Ct. 459, 70 L. Ed.-, confirms our view and relieves us of the necessity of supporting our conclusion by an opinion in these cases.
The order dismissing the petitions for writs of habeas corpus in all these cases, and directing the issuance of warrants of removal as to H. Lloyd Hess, Edwin C. Donaghy, and A. E. Shaw, and postponing action on the petition for a warrant of removal as to Louis J. McGrath, pending a hearing by the District Court on his condition of health, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 F.2d 1020, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-mcgrath-v-mathues-ca3-1926.