United States ex rel. Magnolia City Hospital v. Medical Business Associates, L.L.C.

103 F. App'x 923
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2004
DocketNos. 03-1038, 03-1419
StatusPublished

This text of 103 F. App'x 923 (United States ex rel. Magnolia City Hospital v. Medical Business Associates, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Magnolia City Hospital v. Medical Business Associates, L.L.C., 103 F. App'x 923 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Harold Evans, Greg Evans, and Bunker Hill, LLC (appellants) appeal the district court’s1 order assessing costs and concluding Magnolia City Hospital (Magnolia) was entitled to attorney’s fees. Magnolia cross-appeals the district court’s order concluding it lacked jurisdiction to rule on motions during the pendency of appellants’ appeal. As appellants have acknowledged in their brief, this appeal is premature because the order appealed did not award an amount of attorney’s fees and thus was not final. Accordingly, we dismiss appellants’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Because the district court’s order concluding it lacked jurisdiction during the appeal will be mooted by our dismissal of appellants’ appeal, we dismiss Magnolia’s [924]*924cross-appeal as moot. We also deny as moot Magnolia’s pending motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F. App'x 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-magnolia-city-hospital-v-medical-business-ca8-2004.