United States Ex Rel. Loring J. Whiteside, Relator-Appellant v. J. Edward Slavin and George R. Tiernan

309 F.2d 322, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3847
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 1962
Docket27551_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 309 F.2d 322 (United States Ex Rel. Loring J. Whiteside, Relator-Appellant v. J. Edward Slavin and George R. Tiernan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Ex Rel. Loring J. Whiteside, Relator-Appellant v. J. Edward Slavin and George R. Tiernan, 309 F.2d 322, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3847 (2d Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. After a full hearing Judge Anderson filed adequate findings and conclusions of law supporting his denial of the writ for failure to exhaust state remedies. We affirm.

Petitioner-appellant on March 24, 1959 was convicted of four counts of a twenty-three count indictment for criminal libel after a trial before a jury in the Court of Common Pleas of the State of Connecticut. This conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Errors, State v. Whiteside, 148 Conn. 208, 169 A.2d 260 (1961); reargument was denied and the U. S. Supreme Court denied certio-rari.

Petitioner seeks relief in the federal courts on two major assertions. He claims that the Court of Common Pleas violated the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States by de *323 nying his motion for a bill of particulars, and that alleged prejudice against him by the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut deprived him of due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.

The courts of Connecticut have not passed upon the merits of either of these asserted rights. Habeas corpus in the federal courts is presently unavailable to petitioner, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254; Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469; Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761; United States ex rel. Williams v. LaVallee, 276 F.2d 645 (2 Cir. 1960).

We affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whiteside v. Burlant
215 A.2d 100 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 F.2d 322, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-loring-j-whiteside-relator-appellant-v-j-edward-ca2-1962.