United States Ex Rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Murff

355 U.S. 169, 78 S. Ct. 203, 2 L. Ed. 2d 177, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 46
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 9, 1957
Docket32
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 355 U.S. 169 (United States Ex Rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Murff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Ex Rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Murff, 355 U.S. 169, 78 S. Ct. 203, 2 L. Ed. 2d 177, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 46 (1957).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of the representation in the Solicitor General’s argument at the Bar that the blood grouping test requirement here involved is presently and has been for some time applied without discrimination “in every case, irrespective of race, whenever deemed necessary,” and in view of our remand of the case, we need not now pass upon the claim of unconstitutional discrimination.

*170 It appearing that the blood grouping tests made herein were in some respects inaccurate and the reports thereof partly erroneous and conflicting, the judgments heretofore entered are vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions that the hearings before the Special Inquiry Officer or a Board of Special Inquiry be reopened, so that new, accurate blood grouping tests may be made under appropriate circumstances, and that relevant evidence may be received as offered on the issues involved. The excludability of petitioners remains to be determined upon those proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 U.S. 169, 78 S. Ct. 203, 2 L. Ed. 2d 177, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-lee-kum-hoy-v-murff-scotus-1957.