United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy, Lee Kum Cherk & Lee Moon Wah v. Shaughnessy

16 F.R.D. 558, 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4190
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedNovember 16, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 F.R.D. 558 (United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy, Lee Kum Cherk & Lee Moon Wah v. Shaughnessy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy, Lee Kum Cherk & Lee Moon Wah v. Shaughnessy, 16 F.R.D. 558, 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4190 (S.D.N.Y. 1955).

Opinion

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is a motion by relators pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.—presumably Rule 34—for production of documents, records and files. While no final disposition has been made of the writ of habeas corpus herein, and while, therefore, that writ is still pending before this court, the hearings before the Special Inquiry Officer have been reopened for a limited purpose. See U. S. ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Shaughnessy, 123 F.Supp. 674. It appears that these reopened proceedings are now pending before the administrative authorities. The material requested by relators is for use in the administrative proceedings. In the absence of proof that the Special Inquiry Officer has acted improperly with respect to any application by relators for discovery-this court is powerless. The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Shaughnessy
133 F. Supp. 850 (S.D. New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F.R.D. 558, 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-lee-kum-hoy-lee-kum-cherk-lee-moon-wah-v-nysd-1955.