United States ex rel. Kwami v. Ragnow

Fourth Circuit

United States ex rel. Kwami v. Ragnow

328 F. App'x 871

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2009·No. No. 09-1385·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kwami.; Abdul-Bey appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdul-Bey v. Ragnow, No. 2:09-cv-00011-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2009; Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kwami.; Abdul-Bey appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdul-Bey v. Ragnow, No. 2:09-cv-00011-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2009; Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States ex rel. Kwami v. Ragnow, 328 F. App'x 871 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

328 F. App'x 871 (United States ex rel. Kwami v. Ragnow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related