United States ex rel. Kwami v. Ragnow

328 F. App'x 871
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 27, 2009
DocketNo. 09-1385
StatusPublished

This text of 328 F. App'x 871 (United States ex rel. Kwami v. Ragnow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Kwami v. Ragnow, 328 F. App'x 871 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kwami.; Abdul-Bey appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdul-Bey v. Ragnow, No. 2:09-cv-00011-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2009; Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 F. App'x 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-kwami-v-ragnow-ca4-2009.