United States ex rel. Kelley v. Rundle
353 F.2d 214
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 1965
DocketNo. 15429
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 353 F.2d 214 (United States ex rel. Kelley v. Rundle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States ex rel. Kelley v. Rundle, 353 F.2d 214 (3d Cir. 1965).
Opinion
On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court denying the petition for the writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Higginbotham in his opinion reported at 242 F.Supp. 708 (E.D.Pa.1965).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. CARDONICK
292 A.2d 402 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
353 F.2d 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-kelley-v-rundle-ca3-1965.