United States ex rel. Kelley v. Rundle
353 F.2d 214
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 6, 1965·No. No. 15429·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court denying the petition for the writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Higginbotham in his opinion reported at 242 F.Supp. 708 (E.D.Pa.1965).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States ex rel. Kelley v. Rundle, 353 F.2d 214 (3d Cir. 1965).
353 F.2d 214 (United States ex rel. Kelley v. Rundle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. CARDONICK
292 A.2d 402 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)