United States ex rel. Kantor v. Johnson

Second Circuit

United States ex rel. Kantor v. Johnson

251 F. 889, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1779

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 11, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 251 F. 889 (United States ex rel. Kantor v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States ex rel. Kantor v. Johnson, 251 F. 889, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1779 (2d Cir. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

WARD, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion to grant a stay pending an appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals in a habeas corpus proceeding. Judge Chattfield in the District Court, who remanded the relator, also allowed the appeal, and has refused a stay. If I had allowed the appeal, I would have had power to grant a stay; but the case is now-in the Circuit Court of Appeals, and I do not think a single judge of the court has power to do so.

The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WARD, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion to grant a stay pending an appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals in a habeas corpus proceeding. Judge Chattfield in the District Court, who remanded the relator, also allowed the appeal, and has refused a stay. If I had allowed the appeal, I would have had power to grant a stay; but the case is now-in the Circuit Court of Appeals, and I do not think a single judge of the court has power to do so.

The motion is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 F. 889, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-kantor-v-johnson-ca2-1918.