United States ex rel. Johnson v. Rundle
349 F.2d 416
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMay 28, 1965
DocketNo. 15136
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 349 F.2d 416 (United States ex rel. Johnson v. Rundle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States ex rel. Johnson v. Rundle, 349 F.2d 416 (3d Cir. 1965).
Opinion
The court below made an exhaustive review of the operative facts in this case [417]*417and carefully examined the pertinent authorities. We perceive no error in the proceedings and we will therefore affirm the judgment on the able opinion of Judge Higginbotham, 243 F.Supp. 695 (E.D.Pa.1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gist v. Rundle
214 A.2d 496 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cannon v. Maroney
214 A.2d 498 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Marino v. Myers
214 A.2d 491 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. Myers
213 A.2d 613 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
349 F.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-johnson-v-rundle-ca3-1965.