United States ex rel. Johnson v. Rundle

349 F.2d 416
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 28, 1965·No. No. 15136·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court below made an exhaustive review of the operative facts in this case [417]*417and carefully examined the pertinent authorities. We perceive no error in the proceedings and we will therefore affirm the judgment on the able opinion of Judge Higginbotham, 243 F.Supp. 695 (E.D.Pa.1964).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Johnson v. Rundle, 349 F.2d 416 (3d Cir. 1965).

349 F.2d 416 (United States ex rel. Johnson v. Rundle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gist v. Rundle
214 A.2d 496 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cannon v. Maroney
214 A.2d 498 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Marino v. Myers
214 A.2d 491 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. Myers
213 A.2d 613 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)