United States ex rel. Hunter v. Follette
This text of 420 F.2d 779 (United States ex rel. Hunter v. Follette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm in open court the judgment of the District Court which denied without a hearing John O. Hunter’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Plunter, who is imprisoned after conviction of first degree manslaughter, claims: (1) that he was deprived of a fair trial when the prosecutor informed the jury in his opening statement that Hunter had previously been convicted of a felony similar to the count in the indictment relating to use of a dangerous weapon, former N.Y.Penal Law, Consol. Laws, c. 40, § 1897(1); (2) that he was prejudiced by the State’s failure to provide him with a free copy of the trial transcript although one was available to retained counsel who represented Hunter on his appeal in the State court; and (3) that the state trial court stenographer’s failure to transcribe the opening and closing statements at the trial denied him due process of law. For the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Frankel, 307 F.Supp. 1023 (S.D.N.Y.1969), we hold that the petition was properly denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F.2d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-hunter-v-follette-ca2-1969.